Is Bioprinting the Pathway to Human Cloning?

Is Bioprinting the Pathway to Human Cloning?image credits: Patrick J. Lynch

Bioprinting uses a 3D printing device with biological material to create objects; such as replacement human organs. Scientists have already succeeded in printing skin and vertebral tissues, these two experiments have been tested on animals; like the ear growing out of the rats back scenario. However they are still yet to completely master replicating organs… turns out getting the internal vascular systems are a tad tricky!

So with the ever-changing world around us, I don’t think anybody would have predicted the possibility of actually being able to ‘make’ humans. Of course there has been a way found to create functional organs; therefore a scientists ‘logical’ second step is creating a fully functioning human! According to Vladimir Mironov, it is a “logical extension’’!

The idea is to learn how to produce individual limbs and body parts; subsequently building a whole body. The prospect of printing humans is that they can be created at specific ages using the various stems cells, erasing any need for puberty. Mironov believes that the hurdle will present itself when it comes to tackling the human brain as we will probably never understand it’s functions 100%.The idea behind this evolution is that human beings can be made and printed on demand, whether this defies the natural way life is a personal and separate debate; but we cannot deny that it is ultimately brilliant.

So is this a good idea!? It is clear that Bioprinting can and probably will lead to human cloning but is it really ethical!? The humans will be clones and not actually real people, therefore the strange and quite disturbing aspect (especially for those who knew the original human) is that they will look the same, but won’t be the same. And that is what I ponder on… how will the personalities differ? Will it have a personality!? There I just said the word myself… ‘It’.

DollyThe cloning of Dolly the Lamb was, yes a brilliant experiment. However Dolly died early… whether this is a result of cloning it was never proven, however this factor must be taken into consideration. Another issue is that Dolly was the only successful embryo to be created out of 300; a very low ratio causing a great loss of money through experiments… this will ultimately cost so much more for human experimentation.

So this phenomena really would alter the natural way of life, without producing life the ‘proper way’, what are we really here for!? The aspect of the grieving wishing to bring back loved ones, creating an empty shell of a body that simply resembles your loved one? Bizarre.

This article was written by London printing company,; for business cards, magazines, brochures and other bespoke printing services.


  1. You have sensationalised a very useful technology. I am disabled and want nothing more than a normal life; It would require replacing damaged brain cells, as I have cerebral palsy.

    Instead you choose to talk about clones with differing personalities (I am one of twins and I assure you we have different personalities!) and “bringing back” dead relatives.

    You could have talked about printing brain parts and instead maunder on with obscure crap.

  2. I dont think people will want to print the brain anyway they will want healthy young designer bodies with empty skulls so they can move there current brain in. Or they will put in a simple programmable computer in order to crate prostitution androids etc. And adult body with an inexperienced baby like brain would be quite dangerous and not usefull.

Speak Your Mind